Problem 5.18

The hamburger standard

Download:  0518.dat0518.xls
 
Big Mac prices
In local currency
In dollars
actual $ exchange rate
Implied PPP of the dollar
Local currency valuation
United States
2.3
2.3
Argentina
3.6
3.6
1
1.57
57
Australia
2.45
1.72
1.42
1.07
-25
Austria
34
2.84
12
14.8
23
Belgium
109
3.1
35.2
47.39
-35
Brazil
1500
1.58
949
652
-31
Britain
1.981
2.65
1.46
1.27
15
Canada
2.6
2.06
1.39
1.24
-10
Chile
948
2.28
414
412
-1
China
9
1.03
8.7
3.91
-55
Czech Rep
50
1.71
29.7
21.7
-27
Denmark
25.75
3.85
6.69
11.2
67
France
18.5
3.17
5.83
8.04
38
Germany
4.6
2.69
1.71
2
17
Greece
620
2.47
251
270
8
Holland
5.45
2.85
1.91
2.37
24
Hong Kong
9.2
1.19
7.73
4
-48
Hungary
169
1.66
103
73.48
-29
Italy
550
2.77
1641
1978
21
Japan
391
3.77
104
170
64
Malaysia
3.77
1.4
2.69
1.64
-39
Mexico
8.1
2.41
3.36
3.52
5
Poland
31000
1.4
22433
13748
-40
Portugal
440
2.53
174
191
10
Russia
2900
1.66
1775
1261
-29
Singapore
2.98
1.9
1.57
1.3
-17
S Korea
2300
2.84
810
1000
24
Spain
345
2.5
138
150
9
Sweden
25.5
3.2
7.97
11.1
39
Switzerland
5.7
3.96
1.44
2.48
72
Taiwan
62
2.35
26.4
26.96
2
Thailand
48
1.9
25.3
20.87
-17

     Consider the following regression model:

                 Yi = £]1+£]2Xi+ui

      where Y = actual exchange rate and X = implied PPP of the dollar.

(a)  If the PPP holds, what values of  £]1 and£]2 would you expect a priori? (Suggested Answer)

(b) Does the regression support your expectation? (Eviews) (Rats)
     What formal test do you use to test your hypothesis? (Suggested Answer)

(c) Should the Economist continue to publish the Big Mac Index? Why or why not?
     (Suggested Answer)
 
 

back to mainpage

¡@